|
| |
|
|
Recently Updated
|
|
| |
|
|
Recently Updated
|
Aaron Rodgers's Fan Forum
Discussion forum for Aaron Rodgers's fans.
Please post trade rumors, injury reports and amateur scout suggestions.
Please leave a comment.
Please do not post inappropriate comments, this is a friendly forum for fans.
If you see inappropriate comments, then please report them by clicking the report abuse link below the comment.
Get a widget of this forum.
Add a Comment Refresh Page Auto Refresh |
|
|
Anonymous
Sophomore
|
too too funny that you aaron lovers consider a 6-10 record by aaron is great, but the loss in a championship game with Brett makes him a horrible qb. are you serious??? once and for all, if you want the pack to be a post-season contender again, let's demand that aaron be benched or released and acquire a qb that can win games consistently against good teams. otherwise, let's show pack management a lot of empty seats at lambeau and see if that gets their attention. |
|
Anonymous
Veteran
|
the only other place i read something bad about aaron was some idiot saying that 60% of the sacks were his fault. YEA RIGHT! yes rookie and he could have led them to the superbowl had he not had his int and meltdown that we were oh so used to. -L |
|
Anonymous
Legend
|
Interestingly enough this is the ONLY place where i read that Aaron Rodger is the problem in this team. There's no other place i've read that. And yes, that's a fact too. Find me a critic, a REAL one, who discuss football who would agree that the problem in this team in Aaron Rodgers. Find him.
-Bugs |
|
Anonymous
Sophomore
|
The only difference, Vinny, is that Aaron Rodgers had several years to learn the offense, learn the system, learn the players, and learn how to play in the NFL. He wasn't a rookie, or a second year player when he took over the QB position. He was familiar with everything the team was doing. He just couldn't manage to come away from games with a win. He played really good last year, and is playing really good this year. The team just isn't winning games against quality teams with Aaron at QB. Call that hating if you want to, but it's a fact. /c |
|
Anonymous
Rookie
|
I have a comment on that INT by Brett in the NFC championship game.........he led them to the championship game, and the same Giants "D" that shut down the mighty Patriots offense, picked off a pass from Favre. They had to go to OT to get the win, but the Pack made a game of it. How was that -L |
|
vinny
Rookie
|
all i am sayin is that this is rodgers 2nd year starting and so excpecting him to win all these games like favre did will take a little time remember favre didnt have us in the playoffs his first year and its not hard to believe rodgers will get us there this year 10-6 is not far out of sight im not sure but i would have to believe that favre didnt get us there his 2nd year either and even if he did does that mean if rodgers gets us there the in the same amount of time or less than he is equal to or better than favre the answer is no so quit the comparrisons and give rodgers a little more time u know who should be complaining about their qbs (bills,browns,lions,bucs,etc.) many more teams to name but my point is dont down our team to a level we are obviously above and i know one player doesnt make the team but if rodgers was a trent edwards we wouldn't even be in a hunt for the playoffs one player does make a difference how quickly we are to give credit with experience and on the other hand try to strip the ability to get experience from those who deserve credit vinny |
|
Anonymous
Veteran
|
/c no comment on brent sending the giants to the bowl? with his last pass as a packer being in int? of course not. -L |
|
Anonymous
Rookie
|
Well Bugs, that wasn't so much about Brett, as it was about the Packers team. Aaron played well against the Cowboys. That was a huge win for the Pack. Charles Woodson may have won the game for the pack with the strip of Romo, and the pick at teh goal line. Otherwise, the Cowgirls may have been able to come back. Thats why I feel like the offense needs to score more points, so they can put teams away. /c |
|
Anonymous
Legend
|
I know Vinny that was a heck of a long sentence to read in one breath lol. ;-P just messing with you. And good one -L. Who can forget Brett's last Packer play, an INT that sent that Giants to the SB. And no, i'm not summarizing his career in just one play. Brett is a HOFer, no doubt, a legend, a record carrier. BUT he's no longer part of the Packers present or future and that's what i don't get why Brett lovers don't MOVE ON!
-Bugs |
|
Anonymous
Veteran
|
we would have been in the superbowl had brett not passed the ball right to the giants. Aaron (not arron) was clutch against the cowboys. The man simply can't win with you favre lovers. -L |
|
Anonymous
Veteran
|
say what u will but look foolish later vinny when arron still has a bad season over and over again |
|
Anonymous
Rookie
|
Was that all one sentance Vinny? LOL The Pack went 13-3 with Brett, and were almost in the Superbowl. The following season with Aaron Rodgers leading the same group of guys, they went 6-10. This year, they are 5-4, with only one win against a winning team. Football is a team sport, and wins and losses cannot be placed on one player. But at the same time, the only only position that changed after their 13-3 season, was the QB. It's no secret that Aaron pads his stats when he plays hapless teams like the Lions, so his QB rating only means so much when you compare that with his win/loss record. Alot of the experts claim that Aaron is one of the top 5 QB's in the league. If he's the great player that they claim he is, then he needs to start winning games, because great players play great in big games. I'm yet to see that from Aaron. With the recieving corps that he has, he should be lighting it up every game, not just against the Lions and Browns. /c |
|
Anonymous
Rookie
|
u can argue that numbers dont matter but considering this is rodgers 2nd year aside from having to fill "big shoes" before him which is never an easy task he already has over a 93 qb rating in his first years something favre has never done until u put him in a dome rodgers may hold the ball longer than some at times but getting a sack here and there is better than the consistent favre interceptions which we've all come to know over the years really in the last 10 years before his gb departure what did favre really do for this team i must admit i lost interest in gb games for a while there when favre was under center knowing he would do what he always did giving the game to the other team and he did not dissapoint my knowledge he didnt even look like he was trying for many years there now i am re-interested with the start of rodgers though we are not winning every game i have fun watching the games more than i have in recent years because of rodgers it took eli manning five years to get to a superbowl level first everybody jumped on his case but he won one and he did it sooner than peyton did and peyton is far superior over eli my point is that talk bad about rodgers all u want but when he does what we hope you will be eating those words he is the real deal i have a favre and rodgers jersey and i take care of my rodgers over my favre one too bad the offensive line doesnt do the same for him at game time not to take away from favre but id rather someone there who wants to be rather than someone who looks like he was trying to duck out 5 years before he did great teams like the colts and patriots arent ridiculed because they make the qb look good and in return the qb returns the favor if rodgers has over a 93 qb rating in the last 2 years without a great line insnt it scarry to think if he did and those who keep suggesting romo to gb do us a favor u keep him your obviously not packer fans and that means u r scared to see what will happen to your teams when rodgers reaches the next level in fact your probly cowboy fans who wish to con us out of rodgers because u know romo sucks and rodgers is th qb of the present and future and that would give your team a better chance to get him on your side sorry true gb fans arent stupid we know a gem when we see one thats why we let favre go because we wanted a future not a few more ok years that will end with nothing more than the past ten years he was here has left us say what u will but look foolish later -vinny |
|
Anonymous
Sophomore
|
Hmmmm. Let's see. The Pack chose aaron over Brett, and they would send us to football classes--lol. |
|
Anonymous
Legend
|
You know how they would react? They would send everyone to football classes, as Rodgers is not necessarily the problem in this team. So good luck with your boycott.
-Bugs |
|
Anonymous
Sophomore
|
wonder how pack management would react if we fans threatened to boycott the games until aaron is replaced. they need some strong pressure to field a team that is capable of making it to post-season. |
|
Anonymous
Legend
|
If i were at home, i would direct you to a link of a video on nfl network where they discuss Romo and Rodgers prior to the Cowboys-Packers game. Now those are analysis! Not the crap i see posted here.
-Bugs |
|
Anonymous
Legend
|
LOL girl geez i have a life! I don't live on these boards you know! And no, i don't think Rodgers is better than Romo, but Romo is no better than Rodgers either. To me they're both really good QBs who simply need a little help from their friends aka the rest of the team.
-Bugs |
|
Anonymous
Veteran
|
Didnt think so sorry |
|
Anonymous
Veteran
|
Can you find anyone to help you answer the question |
|
Anonymous
Veteran
|
Do you realy think Rogers is a better qb than Romo. And why |
|
Anonymous
Legend
|
Romo has been a joke for the last 3 years. Bugs With a reacord of 9 and 7 2006 and 13 and 3 2007 and 9 and 7 2008 Yeah surely a good QB contender for the Packs. They realy need someone to help the packs do better. But Romo is still too good for GB. They need a little better qb than Rogers. I know call Peewee Herman
Find me a reliable person who knows football who thinks this way. And again, i can bet you anything that you wouldn't dare to share your "constructive" and "objective" criticism on Rodgers on the Packers official forum.
-Bugs |
|
Anonymous
Veteran
|
Romo has been a joke for the last 3 years. Bugs With a reacord of 9 and 7 2006 and 13 and 3 2007 and 9 and 7 2008 Yeah surely a good QB contender for the Packs. They realy need someone to help the packs do better. But Romo is still too good for GB. They need a little better qb than Rogers. I know call Peewee Herman |
|
Anonymous
Veteran
|
Bugs- Do you know why I can't post on the other board? -Sarah |
