Aaron Rodgers

Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:50:33 GMT

Yeah your laughing all alone

Aaron Rodgers

Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:13:06 GMT

Awwww, i bore you? lol.

-Bugs

Aaron Rodgers

Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:00:28 GMT

Not right now. You bore me. Maybe if god helps the pack to make it in the playoffs. And Brett gets to spank that as# again. And you come up with some excuse why they lost. But they wont make the playoffs for a few more years. so i guess youll have bug someone else bugs

Aaron Rodgers

Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:41:21 GMT

Yeah, the perfect answer from someone with no arguments left. So be my guest if you're still wanna waste your time.

-Bugs

Aaron Rodgers

Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:29:15 GMT

I like to make mess with you. Your a waste of time

Aaron Rodgers

Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:09:26 GMT

Then wtf are you doing here? demanding a QB for a team you're not even fan of. And even if you were a fan then you'd still know where to go. I don't think you're even a Vikings or Favre's fan since you're not there at all. You don't even know where the football boards are. You're just here, and no where but here bashing and bashing Rodgers.

Seriously, you're just a waste of time.

-Bugs

Aaron Rodgers

Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:23:00 GMT

Not a Packer fan anymore.

Aaron Rodgers

Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:21:19 GMT

If you're a Packers fan, you should know it....dummy.

-Bugs

Aaron Rodgers

Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:45:48 GMT

whats the web add dummy

Aaron Rodgers

Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:25:09 GMT

But i bet you won't dare to share your stubborn views in an official board. the end.

-Bugs

Aaron Rodgers

Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:28:21 GMT

They looked to improve upon their 13-3 record from 2007, but finished the season with a 6-10 record and missed the playoffs. And the only thing that changed was the qb. So no matter how you try,you cant shine a (turd) qb like Aaron Rogers.

Aaron Rodgers

Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:35:13 GMT

vinny, the problem is that the Fans and Sucks forum are fused into one. For some odd reason the administrators of this board haven't changed that idiotic way to make fans interact with haters.

-Bugs

Aaron Rodgers

Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:32:24 GMT

The packers went from 13 and 3, and the next year they went to 6 and 4. The only thing that chaged was qbs. You really dont have to be very smart to see what went wrong.

Yes you do. And i rest my case with you cause no matter how many ways i try to approach this, you simply won't get it. You responded exactly the way i thought you would, and i'm not gonna repeat what i already told you and ask you to do cause i'm fed up and tired to go around circles. It's like trying to make a wall reason.

-Bugs

Aaron Rodgers

Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:34:39 GMT

also this is an aaron rodgers fan forum y would people bother coming here just to tear him down first of all i didnt know he even came in this room and second of all good luck on changing peoples minds about him "this is a fans forum" not a haters forum so y would people follow the guidance of the exact opposite thoughts they already believe it would be like trying to convert a mormon to being christian u dont have to be very smart to see whats really wrong here

vinny

Aaron Rodgers

Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:26:15 GMT

so the pack went from 13-3 to 6-4 and we're supposed to trust your expertise, when did the cut six games out of the season? no wonder you don't look at numbers you dont even know how to use them

vinny

Aaron Rodgers

Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:49:08 GMT

The packers went from 13 and 3, and the next year they went to 6 and 4. The only thing that chaged was qbs. You really dont have to be very smart to see what went wrong.

Aaron Rodgers

Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:15:44 GMT

You didn't explain the paradox of aaron being a great qb despite his losing record, and Brett being a terrible qb despite his winning record. I'm waiting to hear an explanation for that, and any of your sports analysts will back me on this, guaranteed.

LOL god almighty, allright. I'll try to do that. It's called STATS and the ones you hate the most (unless it's Favre's of course), the mighty PERSONAL STATS. ok? The ones you and your fellow haters claim Aaron pushes cause he's this horrible selfish creature being born on earth.

Just because a team loses doesn't necessarily mean is the QBs fault. How on earth will i be able to explain this in a way that it could enter your brain and compute at the same time? And if you'll say it's him, we'll get back in circles again, cause i'll ask you AGAIN to give me a reliable source and serious football analysis that would back you up with this!

And for the record, i haven't seen anyone here saying Favre is terrible. Being fed up with him it's something else. But he's not a terrible QB. He's a HOFer and yes, a great QB.

I'm not saying Rodgers is untouchable or this great flawles QB, no one in the NFL is for goodness sakes. But gimme a break.

-Bugs

Aaron Rodgers

Sat, 21 Nov 2009 02:20:26 GMT

Aaron Rodgers

Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:01:24 GMT

No. The "too too funny" thing is that you haters NEVER answer our demands to prove that real football critics have your same views, OR that this is the view of Aaaron Rodgers that SERIOUS football analysts have on him!

Every time i ask you haters to go share your "constructive" and oh so "objective" criticism on the official boards, or when i ask you to gimme a reliable name in sports world analysis who share your same lame views on Rodgers, you simply ignore it and go on with your stupid unfound remarks on Rodgers.

So, in other words, you guys are a JOKE. prove us otherwise!

-Bugs

Aaron Rodgers

Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:50:35 GMT

too too funny that you aaron lovers consider a 6-10 record by aaron is great, but the loss in a championship game with Brett makes him a horrible qb. are you serious??? once and for all, if you want the pack to be a post-season contender again, let's demand that aaron be benched or released and acquire a qb that can win games consistently against good teams. otherwise, let's show pack management a lot of empty seats at lambeau and see if that gets their attention.

Aaron Rodgers

Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:32:44 GMT

the only other place i read something bad about aaron was some idiot saying that 60% of the sacks were his fault. YEA RIGHT!

yes rookie and he could have led them to the superbowl had he not had his int and meltdown that we were oh so used to.

-L

Aaron Rodgers

Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:54:37 GMT

Interestingly enough this is the ONLY place where i read that Aaron Rodger is the problem in this team. There's no other place i've read that. And yes, that's a fact too.

Find me a critic, a REAL one, who discuss football who would agree that the problem in this team in Aaron Rodgers. Find him.

-Bugs

Aaron Rodgers

Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:29:25 GMT

The only difference, Vinny, is that Aaron Rodgers had several years to learn the offense, learn the system, learn the players, and learn how to play in the NFL. He wasn't a rookie, or a second year player when he took over the QB position. He was familiar with everything the team was doing. He just couldn't manage to come away from games with a win. He played really good last year, and is playing really good this year. The team just isn't winning games against quality teams with Aaron at QB. Call that hating if you want to, but it's a fact.

Aaron Rodgers

Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:17:35 GMT

I have a comment on that INT by Brett in the NFC championship game.........he led them to the championship game, and the same Giants "D" that shut down the mighty Patriots offense, picked off a pass from Favre. They had to go to OT to get the win, but the Pack made a game of it.

How was that -L

Aaron Rodgers

Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:58:21 GMT

all i am sayin is that this is rodgers 2nd year starting and so excpecting him to win all these games like favre did will take a little time remember favre didnt have us in the playoffs his first year and its not hard to believe rodgers will get us there this year 10-6 is not far out of sight im not sure but i would have to believe that favre didnt get us there his 2nd year either and even if he did does that mean if rodgers gets us there the in the same amount of time or less than he is equal to or better than favre the answer is no so quit the comparrisons and give rodgers a little more time u know who should be complaining about their qbs (bills,browns,lions,bucs,etc.) many more teams to name but my point is dont down our team to a level we are obviously above and i know one player doesnt make the team but if rodgers was a trent edwards we wouldn't even be in a hunt for the playoffs one player does make a difference how quickly we are to give credit with experience and on the other hand try to strip the ability to get experience from those who deserve credit

vinny