Tuukka Rask Sucks Forum

Discussion forum for Tuukka Rask's anti-fans (Boston Bruins, NHL). Does he suck? Please do not post inappropriate comments, this is a friendly forum for fans. If you see inappropriate comments, then please report them by clicking the report abuse link aside the comment. Comments you post may require a paid membership to delete.

Anonymous (Rookie) wrote on Wed, 29 Aug 2018 22:19:55 GMT reply
It’s been awhile since there was a post.
Rask, you still suck!!!
Anonymous (Rookie) wrote on Wed, 18 Jul 2018 18:47:26 GMT reply
The bruins organization have to be one of the worse in hockey every year same result free agency they grab leftovers no play makers no goal scores last year we lost because you shut down line one and that's it line 2 or 3 suck plus they had chances to grab home ice but idiot rask lost every game down the stretch how much longer you're to realize that Rask is not clutch hes a back up goalie period trade the idiot use. Ack ups to win the cup rask is over paid back up Thomas won the cup for us and please get goal scorers newly and sweeny you suck at your job
Anonymous (Sophomore) wrote on Tue, 10 Jul 2018 23:19:46 GMT reply
I've said time and time again Rask is not a Money goalie certainly not worth 7 Mill I wouldn't put Rask in the top twenty NHL Goalies! Tummy ache or not most important game of the year get rid him and while you're at it get rid of Neely he's in way over his head
Anonymous (Rookie) wrote on Sun, 08 Jul 2018 16:03:46 GMT reply
Halak Rask yes
Anonymous (Rookie) wrote on Sun, 08 Jul 2018 16:03:04 GMT reply
The Halak, Khudobin deal makes no sense
Anonymous (Rookie) wrote on Tue, 03 Jul 2018 11:26:40 GMT reply
The dream is they play Halak regularly, he outshines Rask, and Rask asks for a trade
Anonymous (Rookie) wrote on Mon, 02 Jul 2018 21:55:21 GMT reply
So was Cheevers. So what?
Anonymous (Rookie) wrote on Mon, 02 Jul 2018 21:54:37 GMT reply
Now Rask has no backup goaltender to save him. What now?
Anonymous (Rookie) wrote on Tue, 26 Jun 2018 21:57:36 GMT reply
Tim Thomas at 25% is better than Rask on his best day
Anonymous (Rookie) wrote on Tue, 26 Jun 2018 21:55:57 GMT reply
so what if Thomas didn't go to white house.. Without him no Bruins would have went
Anonymous (Rookie) wrote on Tue, 26 Jun 2018 21:52:34 GMT reply
B's win the cup in 2013 if they still had Tim Thomas..
Anonymous (Rookie) wrote on Sun, 27 May 2018 22:56:15 GMT reply
Rask makes Chris Osgood look good.
Anonymous (Sophomore) wrote on Mon, 21 May 2018 23:52:28 GMT reply
We will not win anything with Rask as the starter. It was clear management had no faith in Khudobin during the playoffs, when he clearly should have started a few games.
Anonymous (Rookie) wrote on Mon, 21 May 2018 02:08:20 GMT reply
I think you are on to something. Relegate Rask to back up and make Khudobin the starter. Work with Khudobin to improve rebounds. Put the pressure on Rask by not starting him and bring in McIntyre to start. Only put Rask in there when absolutely necessary.
Anonymous (Veteran) wrote on Sun, 20 May 2018 22:04:53 GMT reply
We still owe $20,000,000 to Rask too big a hit. We need to bring in McIntyre Nd relegate Rask to the bench and hopefully he will want a trade. But the reality is if you listen to Neely; they are committed to Rask. So until next year or the following when we get him down to $6.5 mill we’re stuck with him.
Anonymous (Rookie) wrote on Sun, 20 May 2018 16:18:54 GMT reply
I suppose Thomas was a class act then? He left us in a lurch and we began to disintegrate immediately after he left. As for my brother who praises Zac MacIntyre as recently as a year ago he and Malcolm Subban who is clearly not NHL material were regularly mentioned in the same breath. Scary. Relegate Rask to backup and start Khodoban next year. What about The Hurricanes goaltender as back up cutting our losses by buying out Rask’s contract?
Anonymous (Veteran) wrote on Sat, 19 May 2018 23:51:14 GMT reply
Ya Thomas was pissed because Chiarelli signed Rask to a $56,000,000 contract. Don’t blame him for losing it after he won them a cup.
Anonymous (Veteran) wrote on Sat, 19 May 2018 23:43:49 GMT reply
Thomas rules, won us a cup bough said
Anonymous (Sophomore) wrote on Sat, 19 May 2018 23:38:12 GMT reply
No you have Tuuka because of Chiarelli.
Anonymous (Rookie) wrote on Sat, 19 May 2018 19:25:37 GMT reply
Still, if you want to rag on Tuukka for mental softness, look at the little psycho named Thomas
Anonymous (Sophomore) wrote on Sat, 19 May 2018 17:45:19 GMT reply
Tuukka can thank Timmy the Tank for getting his name engraved on the Cup.
Anonymous (Rookie) wrote on Sat, 19 May 2018 17:19:49 GMT reply
In Rask there is much to be desired but remember it was that little baby and psycho Tim Thomas who had his little mental breakdown and started all sorts of problems.
Anonymous (Sophomore) wrote on Sat, 19 May 2018 14:36:39 GMT reply
Hi guys it’s Tuuka. Did you know I was invited to the royal wedding? I had to turn it down; I didn’t think I could stand on my feet that long during the ceremony and they wouldn’t let me wear my comfy pads.
Anonymous (Sophomore) wrote on Sat, 19 May 2018 01:18:48 GMT reply
Watching Vegas play tonight. They currently have 12 shots, if they were playing against Rask...they’d have 3-4 goals.
Anonymous (Rookie) wrote on Fri, 18 May 2018 19:10:39 GMT reply
Rask is worse than Ranford.
More Comments...

If the editor doesn't load, then click the button below or refresh the page.

Load Editor
Bold Italic Underline Left Center Right Ordered List Bulleted List Hyperlink Image
Smiley Face Heart
Big Smile
Smiley Tongue
Surprised

Link to this webpage

Get this forum in your email inbox.

via reblinks
Find a Player

About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Service DivorceIt.ca