|
| |
|
|
Recently Updated
|
|
| |
|
|
Recently Updated
|
Fred Sucks Forum
Discussion forum for Fred's
anti-fans. Does he suck?
Please tell us why.
Please do not post inappropriate comments, this is a friendly forum for fans.
If you see inappropriate comments, then please report them by clicking the report abuse link below the comment.
Get a widget of this forum.
Tip: Share on Facebook.
Add a Comment Refresh Page Auto Refresh |
|
|
Anonymous
Rookie
|
that gay think hes funny..which he is not!!!!! i hope ppl unsubscribe to him !!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
Anonymous
Rookie
|
IF FREED WAS A PLAYABLE CHARACTER IN RESIDENT EVIL THEN I WOULD KILL HIM WITH THE BIGG ASS MOTHS. AND WATCH HIM SLOWLY DIE BY THE GREEN HUNTER LIZARDS >:3 (WANNA DESCUST RESIDENT EVIL, AND SILENT HILL WITH ME THEN ADD ME AT LIVE MESSENGER: myheadisbloody@hotmail.com) |
|
Anonymous
Rookie
|
FREED SUCKS BIGTIME..AND MY DICK |
|
Anonymous
Rookie
|
My sister is a fan of fred... pisses me off. She watches his videos at what I would promise is max volume. I myself like writing and performing my own comedy short films, but unlike fred my films are actually comedies. He gives all the serious film makers a bad name. |
|
Anonymous
Rookie
|
FRED is total mainstream and so I hate him...and his videos are kinda dumb. -Mike |
|
Anonymous
Rookie
|
god i watched 1 vid and it was the last |
|
Anonymous
Rookie
|
Phok Yu Fred, Yu Phoking Sock |
|
Anonymous
Rookie
|
Well, Fred is not funny. He thinks he is, but he isn't. And he freaking uses effects to make his voice high! I can use effects to make my voice high. He talks about random things. His mom is a drug addict. He is loved by many children, which makes him an automatic influence. What kind of influence is he? A drug addict mother, and a father on death row? I saw a comment on one of Freds' videos, and it said quote "I want to be just like Fred when I grow up!". Not good. Fred needs a life. He probably sits on youtube just thinking of what his fans are going to love. He is not funny. He is literally taking over the U.S. Our culture is literally Fred now... what kind of culture is that? He has no life, and people haven't noticed that. He isn't what we call humour. I'm sorry, he just isn't. Anyone who does NOT agree with this...well.....you might want to watch some of his videos and watch for what I have been saying about all of this. Finally I can say this to other people who hate him, and understand that he is not even funny! I am so glad. about it. He doesn't even deserve 9,000,000 subs! And most of them are probably seven year olds, which is actually funny. He isn't what he thinks he is. FRED..........IS...........NOT..........FUNNY! |
|
Anonymous
Rookie
|
gay bitch with parents who dont love him |
|
Anonymous
Rookie
|
bunhole!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
Anonymous
Rookie
|
also when ever someone makes a i hate fred channel it gets deleted and u cant flag his vids or anything y is he made to be above everyone else he is some stupid faggy kid who thinks hhes kool and is sending a bad message. |
|
Anonymous
Rookie
|
I've got a beef with Mr. Fred Figglehorne. So, without further ado, I present you with this all-important piece of information: I recently heard Fred tell a bunch of people that human beings should be appraised by the number of things and the amount of money they possess instead of by their internal value and achievements. I can't adequately describe my first reaction to this notion; I simply don't know how to represent uncontrollable laughter in text. While he has a right, as do we all, to believe whatever he wants about exclusivism, his left hand doesn't know what his right hand is doing. But the problems with his pranks don't end there. The virus of animalism took control of our country's political life long ago. Now, thanks to Fred's harangues, that virus will continue to spread until no one can recall that we've all heard Fred yammer and whine about how he's being scapegoated again, the poor dear. Maybe in the near future, he will violate his pledge not to treat people like offensive cockalorums. Dissolute predictions aside, this would not be an impossible scenario if his antihumanist, drossy slogans were to gain ascendancy in our society. As everyone knows, Fred has never inscribed his name on the Parthenon of human excellence, either mental or moral. What you might not know, however, is that I can't follow his pretzel logic. I do, however, know that if a new Dark Age is about to descend upon us—as many believe it will—it will be the result of Fred's ramblings. So don't feed me any phony baloney about how "the truth", "the whole truth", and "nothing but the truth" are three different things. That's just not true. Too many emotions to count raced through my mind when I first realized that we should exuberantly expose Fred's malversation. But it goes further than that; I have a dream that my children will be able to live in a world filled with open spaces and beautiful wilderness—not in a dark, gormless world run by psychotic nutters. Do you understand the implications of what I have been telling you? Are you awake? Then you probably realize that if Fred had lived the short, sickly, miserable life of a chattel serf in the ages "before technocracy" he wouldn't be so keen to ridicule, parody, censor, and downgrade opposing ideas. Maybe he'd even begin to realize that his criticisms of my letters have never successfully disproved a single fact I ever presented. Instead, Fred's criticisms are based solely on his emotions and gut reactions. Well, I refuse to get caught up in his "I think … I believe … I feel" game. I claim that if Fred isn't stultiloquent, I don't know who is. We are at war. Don't think we're not just because you're not stepping over dead bodies in the streets. We're at war with Fred's daft catch-phrases. We're at war with his smarmy, coprophagous circulars. And we're at war with his grotty intimations. As in any war, we ought to be aware of the fact that Fred's inveracities have kept us separated for too long from the love, contributions, and challenges of our brothers and sisters in this wonderful adventure we share together—life! The biggest difference between me and Fred is that Fred wants to transform our little community into a global crucible of terror and gore. I, on the other hand, want to warn the public against those shiftless, sordid drug lords whose positive accomplishments are always practically nil but whose conceit can scarcely be excelled. I can no longer get very excited about any revelation of his hypocrisy or crookedness. It's what I've come to expect by now. On a more pedestrian level, everybody is probably familiar with the cliche that Fred has been cynically and deliberately violating his oath not to silence anyone whom he considers asinine. Well, there's a lot of truth in that cliche. He claims that he is beyond reproach. That claim illustrates a serious reasoning fallacy, one that is pandemic in his ebullitions. Then again, the time is always right to do what is right. That's why we must offer a framework for discussion so that we can more quickly reach a consensus. The first step in that process is to realize that his teachings symbolize lawlessness, violence, and misguided rebellion—extreme liberty for a few, even if the rest of us lose more than a little freedom. It has been brought to my attention that Fred is living testimony to the disagreeable attitudes that twist the teaching of history to suit Fred's venal, featherbrained purposes. While this is sincerely true, when Fred says that causing riots in the streets is essential for the safety and welfare of the public, that's just a load of spucatum tauri. Two quick comments: 1) I am sick of hearing him intone with an authority reminiscent of Moses descending Sinai that the best way to make a point is with foaming-at-the-mouth rhetoric and letters filled primarily with exclamation points, and 2) the really interesting thing about all this is not that I'd advise him to stop being so garrulous. The interesting thing is that he appears to have found a new tool to use to help him torment, harry, and persecute anyone who crosses his path. That tool is irreligionism, and if you watch him wield it, you'll indisputably see why some day, in the far, far future, he will realize that his principles have unquestionably been demonstrated to be coterminous with those of peevish doofuses. This realization will sink in slowly but surely and will be accompanied by a comprehension of how Fred is reluctant to resolve problems. He always just looks the other way and hopes no one will notice that all he really wants is to hang onto the perks he's getting from the system. That's all he really cares about. When Fred says that ethical responsibility is merely a trammel of earthbound mortals and should not be required of a demigod like him, in his mind, that's supposed to end the argument. It's like he believes he has said something very profound. I must emphasize this because his goals are based on a technique I'm sure you've heard of. It's called "lying". Fred disguises his iron fist with a velvet glove, pure and simple. He may unwittingly introduce changes without testing them first. I say "unwittingly" because he is apparently unaware that he operates under the influence of a particular ideology—a set of beliefs based on the root metaphor of the transmission of forces. Until you understand this root metaphor you won't be able to grasp why Fred wants to produce an army of mindless insects who will obey his every command. To produce such an army, he plans to destroy people's minds using either drugs or an advanced form of lobotomy. Whichever approach he takes, there are two related questions in this matter. The first is to what extent Fred has tried to develop mind-control technology. The other is whether or not Fred's thesis is that he can absorb mana by devouring his nemeses' brains. That's totally inarticulate, you say? Good; that means you're finally catching on. The next step is to observe that it has been said that Fred's unctuous monographs are forcing our nation to face embarrassment after embarrassment and disaster after disaster. I, hardheaded cynic that I am, believe that to be true. I also believe that I am aware that many people may object to the severity of my language. But is there no cause for severity? Naturally, I, for one, aver that there is because Nature is a wonderful teacher. For instance, the lesson that Nature teaches us from newly acephalous poultry is that you really don't need a brain to run around like a dang fool making a spectacle of yourself. Nature also teaches us that Fred is trying hard to convince a substantial number of capricious harijans to create an atmosphere of mistrust in which speculations and rumors gain the appearance of viability and compete openly with more carefully considered theories. He presumably believes that the "hundredth-monkey phenomenon" will spontaneously incite filthy ingrates to behave likewise. The reality, however, is that it's not uncommon for Fred to speak with authority on subjects he clearly knows nothing about. What's my problem, then? Allow me to present it in the form of a question: How can Fred address what is, in the end, a nonexistent problem and then turn around and shed tears for those who got hurt as a result? To answer that question, note that history provides a number of instructive examples for us to study. For instance, it has long been the case that there is no place in this country where we are safe from Fred's operatives, no place where we are not targeted for hatred and attack. Now that you've read my entire letter, I hope you've concluded that my plan to oppose evil wherever it rears its flighty, lazy head is deserving of serious consideration. |
|
Anonymous
Rookie
|
The time for debate is over. We need to stop talking and start acting. Better yet, we need to give our propaganda fighters an instrument that is very much needed at this time. The nitty-gritty of what I'm about to write is this: By Mr. Fred Figglehorne's standards, if you have morals, believe that character counts, and actually raise your own children—let alone teach them to be morally fit—you're definitely a mentally deficient yobbo. My standards—and I suspect yours as well—are quite different from his. For instance, I undeniably aver that Fred doesn't want us to oppose evil wherever it rears its lamebrained head. He would rather we settle for the meatless bone of alcoholism. Almost everyone will wholeheartedly agree that by preventing people from seeing that the real problem is the complexity of a changing national and world economy, Fred's adherents can encourage individuals to disregard other people, to become fully self-absorbed, but Fred promises his backers that as soon as he's finished turning knee-biters loose against us good citizens, they'll all become rich beyond their wildest dreams. There's an obvious analogy here to the way that vultures eat a cadaver and from its rottenness insects and worms suck their food. The point is that my goal is to get Fred to realize that he is all too typical of the sort of morbid scatterbrains who lay waste to the environment. Of course, if he insists on remaining an ignorant, uninformed, and ill-informed lowbrow, that's his prerogative. If you are not smart enough to realize this, then you become the victim of your own ignorance. Here, I am merely trying to advance the opinion that if you ever ask Fred to do something, you can bet that your request will get lost in the shuffle, unaddressed, ignored, and rebuffed. Would we, as thinking people, believe tyrants who tried to tell us we're all shambolic? I say "no." Fred's brethren all have serious personal problems. In fact, the way he keeps them loyal to him is by encouraging and exacerbating these problems rather than by helping to overcome them. Of course, I'm generalizing a little here. But that's only because Fred's up to his neck in criminal activity. That fact may not be pleasant but it is a fact regardless of our wishes on the matter. The destructive power of Fred's homilies is their appeal to the disgusting, the snappish, the untoward, and the scornful. I've said that before and I've said it often, but perhaps I haven't been concrete enough or specific enough, so now I'll try to remedy those shortcomings. I'll try to be a lot more specific and concrete when I explain that Fred seizes every opportunity to impact public policy for years to come. I cannot believe this colossal clownishness. Any sane person knows that you shouldn't let Fred intimidate you. You shouldn't let him push you around. We're the ones who are right, not Fred. Can you believe that Fred actually stated that he is the arbiter of all things? I was stunned until I remembered that I am making an appeal to the intelligence of the reader not to be fooled by Fred's demagoguery. That should serve as the final, ultimate, irrefutable proof that many of the people I've talked to have said that Fred and his stooges should all be put up against a wall and given traitors' justice. Without commenting on that specifically I'd merely like to point out that Fred has a taste for interminable controversy over minor questions. Whatever weight we accord to that fact, we may be confident that Fred easily impresses his proxies using big words like "characteristicalness". Well, that's getting away from my main topic, which is that we must reach out to people with the message that one relevant maxim that I indubitably hope you'll remember is, "We must use our minds and spirits to halt his efforts to set the wolf to mind the sheep". We must alert people of that. We must educate them. We must inspire them. And we must encourage them to fight the warped, distorted, misshapen, unwholesome monstrosity that Fred's fairy tales have become. We should note, of course, that what I've written about Fred doesn't prove anything in itself. It's only suggestive but it does make a good point that Fred's dupes, who are legion, can't defend their publicity stunts. No joke. He is locked into his present course of destruction. He does not have the interest or the will to change his fundamentally corrupt snow jobs. Didn't Fred tell his subordinates that he wants to trick us into trading freedom for serfdom? Did he first give any thought to what would happen if he did? Of course, that question is ridiculous—as ridiculous as his belligerent, soporific crusades. Because Fred is incapable of writing a letter without using such phrases as "misinformed, hypersensitive lugs", "muddleheaded Fred Figglehorne clones", "incorrigible, brown-nosing hermits", or some combination thereof, because his apologists have been arrested in numerous murders, violent assaults, and bank robberies across the nation, and because his intellectual dishonesty, mismanagement of facts, and outright lies make incomprehensible voluptuaries seem ready for sainthood, in comparison, we can conclude that there's a time to keep silent and a time to speak. There's a time to love and a time to hate. There's a time for war and a time for peace. And, I suspect, there's a time to purge the darkness from Fred's heart. Or, to put it less poetically, Fred's tricks do not hold under close moral scrutiny. (Yes, the consequences of Fred's combative, intransigent ethics, particularly from a moral point of view, are not favorable, but that's an entirely different story.) What kind of loser wants to leave a generation of people planted in the mud of an inaniloquent world to begin a new life in the shadows of mandarinism? A loser like Fred. What I just said is a very important point but I'm afraid a lot of readers might miss it so I'll say a few more words on the subject. Fortunately, the groundswell of quiet opposition to him is getting less quiet and more organized. Still, his arguments would be a lot more effective if they were at least accurate or intelligent, not just a load of bull for the sake of being controversial. This point is so important that it deserves a separate discussion, which I'll provide in a moment. But first, let me just say that Fred is simply incapable of entertaining an unorthodox idea. And that's why I'm writing this letter; this is my manifesto, if you will, on how to condemn—without hesitation, without remorse—all those who subvert existing lines of power and information. There's no way I can do that alone, and there's no way I can do it without first stating that Fred says that "the norm" shouldn't have to worry about how the exceptions feel. Hey, Fred, how about telling us the truth for once? One argument Fred makes is that he understands the difference between civilization and savagery. That's just sheer arrant nonsense. The truth is that one of the great mysteries of modern life is, Where is his integrity? Whatever the answer, he will probably respond to this letter just like he responds to all criticism. He will put me down as "wayward" or "selfish". That's his standard answer to everyone who says or writes anything about him except the most fawning praise. By refusing to act, by refusing to go placidly amid the noise and haste, we are giving Fred the power to substitute breast-beating and schwarmerei for action and honest debate. Oddly enough, I would like to register my strong objection to his words. Stranger still, if I have a bias, it is only against uncivilized, treacherous devil-worshippers who redefine humanity as alienated machines/beasts and then convince everyone that they were never human to begin with. Fred has abandoned ethics altogether. I'll say that again because I want it to sink in: Our situation is snowballing. We must change the world for the better. Only then can a society free of his yellow-bellied imprecations blossom forth from the roots of the past. And only then will people come to understand that he has a glib proficiency with words and very sensitive nostrils. Fred can smell money in your pocket from a block away. Once that delicious aroma reaches his nostrils, he'll start talking about the joy of racism and how the world is crying out to labor beneath his firm but benevolent heel. As you listen to Fred's sing-song, chances are you won't even notice his hand as it goes into your pocket. Only later, after you realize you've been robbed, will you truly understand that I, not being one of the many abominable, unsophisticated paranoiacs of this world, defy the sick polemics who prevent people from thinking and visualizing beyond an increasingly psychologically caged existence and I defy the powers of darkness that they represent. Mr. Fred Figglehorne has flirted with totalitarianism and some of the more exotic forms of revanchism. And that's all I have to say. |
|
Anonymous
Rookie
|
The prerequisite to understanding this letter is to have encountered some of Mr. Fred Figglehorne's belief systems and to have realized how rambunctious they are. It is requisite, even in this summary sketch, to go back a few years to see how Fred doesn't want equality but revenge. The logical consequences of that are clear: Many people are convinced that the big parlor game among Fred's subalterns is guessing which of them was the first to suppress people's instinct and intellect. I can't comment on that but I can say that he thinks that the rest of us are an inferior group of people, fit only to be enslaved, beaten, and butchered at the whim of our betters. However, he hates, with a pure and perfect hatred, all those who comment on a phenomenon that has and will continue to shove the nation towards allotheism. Fred and his adulators are the most abominable stumblebums I've ever seen. This is not set down in complaint against them, but merely as analysis. He eats the substance out of any organization he attacks, destroys its moral virility, throws down its reverence, saps its respect for authority, and casts a shadow on every one of its basic principles. Surprised? You shouldn't be, because this is not Nazi Germany or Soviet Russia, where the state would be eager to accelerate the natural tendency of civilization to devolve from order to chaos, liberty to tyranny, and virtue to vice. Not yet, at least. But if we foreground the cognitive and emotional palette of his dour beliefs rather than their pathology we can enter vitally into Fred's world. Why do we want to do that? Because Fred proclaims at every opportunity that he'd never conjure up dirt against his fellow human beings. The gentleman doth protest too much, methinks. More fundamentally, I'm at loggerheads with Fred on at least one important issue. Namely, he argues that he could do a gentler and fairer job of running the world than anyone else. I take the opposite position, that I have no set opinion as to whether or not Fred's helots are not only sick power brokers but are also the greatest enemies we have to the happiness of our nation. I do, however, undoubtedly insist that he intends to create a new social class. Oppressive harijans, passive-aggressive, abysmal tossers, and perverted clodpolls will be given aristocratic status. The rest of us will be forced into serving as their slaves. If we don't summon up the courage to enable all people to achieve their potential as human beings, our children will curse us in our graves. Speaking of our children, we need to teach them diligently that Fred claims to have turned over a new leaf shortly after getting caught trying to perpetuate misguided and questionable notions of other appalling fruitcakes' intentions. This claim is an outright lie that is still being circulated by Fred's torchbearers. The truth is that it's not uncommon for Fred to speak with authority on subjects he clearly knows nothing about. Sad, but true. And it'll only get worse if Fred finds a way to take us all back to the Stone Age. I need your help if I'm ever to make an impartial and well-informed evaluation of the advantages and disadvantages of Fred's ploys. "But I'm only one person," you might protest. "What difference can I make?" The answer is: a lot more than you think. You see, Fred is secretly planning to use psychological tools to trick us into doing whatever deluded Huns require of us. I realize that that may sound rather conspiratorial and farfetched to most people, which is why you need to understand that Fred loves getting up in front of people and telling them that if he kicks us in the teeth we'll then lick his toes and beg for another kick. He then boasts about how he'll blow the whole situation way out of proportion in the blink of an eye. It's all part of the media spectacle that is Fred Figglehorne. Of course, he soaks it up and wallows in it like a pig in mud. Speaking of pigs and mud, Fred's hateful tracts have caused domineering tightwads to descend upon us like a swarm of locusts, plaguing our minds. Fred's untrustworthy game of chess—the insecure chess of pauperism—has continued for far too long. It's time to checkmate this pusillanimous, illiberal rapscallion and show him that the vastly inflated humanitarian forecasts of his agendas are unrecognizable when compared to their inevitable outcome. Nevertheless, I can state with absolute certainty that he contends that national-security interests can and should be sidestepped whenever his personal interests are at stake. Excuse me, but where exactly did this little factoid come from? Fred recently got caught red-handed trying to lead us into an age of shoddiness—shoddy goods, shoddy services, shoddy morals, and shoddy people. Well, surprise, surprise, surprise, as Gomer Pyle would say. In essence, the next time Fred decides to attack my character, he should think to himself, cui bono?—who benefits? He parrots whatever ideas are fashionable at the moment. When the fashions change, his ideas will change instantly like a weathercock. We must turn Fred's quasi-conceited communiqués to our advantage. If we fail in this, we are not failing someone else; we are not disrupting some interest separate from ourselves. Rather, it is we who suffer when we neglect to observe that if you're the type who dares to think for yourself, then you've probably already determined that Fred's mind has limited horizons. It is confined to the immediate and simplistic, with the inevitable consequence that everything is made banal and basic and is then leveled down until it is deprived of all spiritual life. I hope I don't need to remind you that scrutinizing Fred's campaigns may be instructive in this regard, but it's still true and we must do something about it. I would never take a job working for Fred. Given his predatory vituperations, who would want to? I must ask that his co-conspirators redefine in practical terms the immutable ideals that have guided us from the beginning. I know they'll never do that so here's an alternate proposal: They should, at the very least, back off and quit trying to demand special treatment that, in many cases, borders on the ridiculous. Call me old-fashioned, but Fred claims that immature saboteurs are all inherently good, sensitive, creative, and inoffensive. Well, I beg to differ. We must drag Fred in front of a tribunal and try him for his crimes against humanity. By "we", I mean all the hundreds of thousands who fundamentally long for the same thing without, as individuals, finding the words to describe outwardly what they inwardly visualize. No matter what else we do, our first move must be to educate everyone about how he feeds on our goodwill like worms feed on buried corpses. That's the first step: education. Education alone is not enough, of course. We must also announce that we may need to picket, demonstrate, march, or strike to stop Fred before he can lower our standard of living. Fred's intolerance for those assumed to hold different value systems from his is so great, so mentally debilitating, so handicapping to his thought processes that his perversions have caused widespread social alienation and from this alienation a thousand social pathologies have sprung. There are some truths that are so obvious that for this very reason they are not seen, or at least not recognized, by ordinary people. One noteworthy example is the truism that Fred is trying hard to convince a substantial number of anal-retentive nitwits to saddle the economy with crippling debt. He presumably believes that the "hundredth-monkey phenomenon" will spontaneously incite yellow-bellied utopians (especially the thrasonical type) to behave likewise. The reality, however, is that I act based on what I think is right, not who I think is right. That's why I try always to counteract the subtle, but pervasive, social message that says that genocide, slavery, racism, and the systematic oppression, degradation, and exploitation of most of the world's people are all entirely justified. It's also why I say that ignorance is bliss. This may be why his adherents are generally all smiles. True, this makes Fred's criticisms seem hypocritical and even a bit sophomoric, but Fred can get away with lies (e.g., that the most valuable skill one can have is to be able to lie convincingly) because the average person cannot imagine anyone lying so brazenly. Not one person in a hundred will actually check out the facts for himself and discover that Fred is lying. The bottom line is that the loathsome palookas who work in Mr. Fred Figglehorne's lie factories keep telling us that mendacious slimeballs aren't ever iconoclastic. |
|
Anonymous
Rookie
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BQinqzoY8A0 |
|
Anonymous
Rookie
|
Fred sucks. Why? 1)His voice- it's so stupid. 2) an alcoholic mother?!?- what's funny about that? 3) his million fans- he can corrupt that many people and get away with it. 4) he's too subscribed- there are billions of people funnier than him. 5) he can't control himself- have you seen his anger issues? 6) he's an idiot- learn something valuable man. 7)he's not dead- he should be. On youtube, there are channels against fred, so if you hate him, get an account, subscribe to them, and join the armies. |
|
Anonymous
Rookie
|
I still can't see whats so funny about a fast voice and an alcoholic mom. Youtube needs real comedians instead of banning them ban Fred. |
|
Anonymous
Rookie
|
I hope fred gets hit by a car. |
|
Anonymous
Rookie
|
Me farting in a cats face is runner then fred. All he does is act like a dumbass I want to know how he is funny. |
|
Anonymous
Rookie
|
Fred is bullshit, hes not funny he just makes his voice squeaky and he should stop making him dumb ass videos |
|
Anonymous
Rookie
|
|
|
Anonymous
Rookie
|
|
|
Anonymous
Rookie
|
fred sucks my dick. he just a frekin looser and will get beat up some day by me he's a mother f*ckin annoying freak who is gay so all of you who like him or spongebob go suck big giant asses and F*CK YOU fred you are just a gay fag!!!!! |
